Popularity doesn’t always correlate to student success. I know someone personally who took lessons from them and it wasn’t a successful lesson if you judge on improvement and obviously students as just as much influence if not more than the teacher. That’s just a one off and not an overall indication of their teaching business. I’d take a lesson from them but I’m not paying what they all currently charging.
I’ve taken a lesson from Mike at his house like 9 years ago when he was about the only person I could find with Swing Catalyst pressure plates. Super nice guy, very personable and the information he gave me was correct. From the medical information he shared with me that day..he won’t be able to swing they are currently teaching imo. I think that’s part of the reason they taught a more hands in front of the sternum and stays there type of swing. That’s pure speculation on my part. Here I am double chin and all😂
https://www.instagram.com/p/BCYowiTnfts/?igsh=ZTR6dmtkbWw1cHR0
I’m not saying that all of this technology isn’t a positive which I believe it is…I believe that we are stilling learning about learning and there is something we still haven’t figured to really make it a game changer for most golfers.
I must not have articulated myself correctly. What I was trying to to say is if the word gets around that xyz is a good coach, people will flock to them, making scheduling lessons harder for the students, also rightly so the teacher will start to charge more since demand has grown. All negatives for the original students. Basically the gankas situation. He was charging like $150 or $200 or whatever it was an hour at one point before he got famous. Within a very short period of time he went up to $800 an hour and months long wait list. He’s seems like a solid dude because he grandfathered in his original students to their previous rates.