Jump to content
2025 Members Choice voting is now open! Vote now for your favorite gear! ×

airjammer

Advanced Members
  • Posts

    2066
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    100%

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

airjammer's Achievements

689

Reputation

  1. I told people to DM if they wanted to further the conversation. What did you expect?
  2. Care to expand on that comment further, like an example? Far as radius in general my right arm collapses too much in transition as I increase speed.
  3. If he didn’t, he knows now😂
  4. Improve speed absolutely yes…improve accuracy not really.
  5. That to ask questions than it is for some people to make smart-ss comments just giggles and likes as it does nothing to further any conversation.
  6. There were never goal posts as there was never a game. Just a exchange of ideas. Just like the video. Here is the some data we have gathered, this is how we interpreted, this is how we think you should implement our findings. All opinions except for some aggregate data.
  7. Kinda but not really. It’s morphed into a general golf instruction.
  8. According to Dana Dalhquist it’s true. Even for myself it’s true…a couple years ago I made a speed journey and went from 160 to 178 with just a driver and gc2 launch monitor in a 6 month period. Never ever made such a gain in accuracy. Not saying it’s not possible,..I just haven’t come across the information or if I have, I haven’t dedicated myself to the process of implementing the information. It’s like lifting weights. If you stick with a program and do it long enough you will get stronger even if you don’t eat right..like people in prison. People have been swinging the same swing for years trying to hit it closer but it pretty never happens. It’s just different. Do you agree it is different and if so why?
  9. No, I agreed with you..point well made. I just advanced the conversation to another the other part of the performance equation…dispersion. instead of playing some sort if gotcha game that I’m not playing…why not just answer the question if you have any opinion.
  10. Popularity doesn’t always correlate to student success. I know someone personally who took lessons from them and it wasn’t a successful lesson if you judge on improvement and obviously students as just as much influence if not more than the teacher. That’s just a one off and not an overall indication of their teaching business. I’d take a lesson from them but I’m not paying what they all currently charging. I’ve taken a lesson from Mike at his house like 9 years ago when he was about the only person I could find with Swing Catalyst pressure plates. Super nice guy, very personable and the information he gave me was correct. From the medical information he shared with me that day..he won’t be able to swing they are currently teaching imo. I think that’s part of the reason they taught a more hands in front of the sternum and stays there type of swing. That’s pure speculation on my part. Here I am double chin and all😂 https://www.instagram.com/p/BCYowiTnfts/?igsh=ZTR6dmtkbWw1cHR0 I’m not saying that all of this technology isn’t a positive which I believe it is…I believe that we are stilling learning about learning and there is something we still haven’t figured to really make it a game changer for most golfers. I must not have articulated myself correctly. What I was trying to to say is if the word gets around that xyz is a good coach, people will flock to them, making scheduling lessons harder for the students, also rightly so the teacher will start to charge more since demand has grown. All negatives for the original students. Basically the gankas situation. He was charging like $150 or $200 or whatever it was an hour at one point before he got famous. Within a very short period of time he went up to $800 an hour and months long wait list. He’s seems like a solid dude because he grandfathered in his original students to their previous rates.
  11. Yes I agree with that..he did a good job with the information he was given. The only push back I would say to the Mark Crossfield story is that gaining speed is the easiest thing to implement. That’s why there is tons of speed training devices that universally work if you put in the time and effort but not many if at all proven universally accuracy improving devices. What are your thoughts on the last part?
  12. Care to expand on that comment as in what is interesting?
  13. Absolutely true..it’s a discussion forum. If you aren’t allowed to give you opinions or different views or facts this instruction forum about might as well be a new YouTube video list with comments closed. On top of that it might was well say in the listing what channel sponsored the video so when someone is all screwed up by going down a rabbit hole that never fit them…they know who to go visit to fix them😂 We already have a section for posting your own swing videos so what exactly is this section for? As long as I have been here, it’s been swing theory discussion. Even though it might not come across in text…all of this is friendly conversation that ai expect push back in hopes of diving deeper into the subject matter. Otherwise, why even comment at all?
×
×
  • Create New...