Jump to content
2025 Members Choice voting is now open! Vote now for your favorite gear! ×

A.Princey

Advanced Members
  • Posts

    3944
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    100%

Personal Information

  • Handicap
    4
  • Location
    Sconnie

Recent Profile Visitors

5705 profile views

A.Princey's Achievements

1.2k

Reputation

  1. About the same size, overall. Toe hang on ER9 is minimal, like 10* maybe. Nearly face balanced.
  2. eBay. Really liking my Daddy Long Legs more, probably gonna move it on soon. It’s a very stable, solid putter, but I just like the TM a bit more. Plus, I’ve still got my trusty EXO 7s for backup.
  3. I think I've really nailed down the root cause of my issue. My swing has been lengthening, for the worse, not better. I've always played from a pretty compact backswing, but my increased level of activity lately, combined with more golf, has got me taking the club too far back. I've always exhibited some EE, so this extra "time" to square the club has me completely ahead of impact. I started forcing a 2/3 backswing, and contact/flight was so much better once again, without having to manipulate anything. I've gotta keep an image of Jon Rahm in mind when things get hairy. This could also explain why I sometimes lose connection late in a round, as my muscles & ligaments have fully warmed up and are allowing my body to rotate and enter way too deep into the backswing.
  4. Not gonna lie, but without adjustable weighting like Lab, there’s no way to perfectly balance the head for lie/loft alterations. The shaft has to point directly through the CoG to be ZT or like Lab. You’d have to mess with the heel/toe weighting, to rebalance for lie adjustment. Now, with that said. 1-2* of adjustment in itself might not even change how the putter works for YOU. It will just be slightly out of “perfect”.
  5. Yes, it absolutely would.
  6. The part I think is unreal, is the flat bottom. It just wants to sit so square to my path. I can sorta grip, re grip or whatever, standing over the ball and the head just stays perfectly square.
  7. If a person can get past the looks of a larger MOI mallet, and distance control with it is good, the face stability alone is worth using one. Since switching from a blade to a mallet, my path and intended line are SOOOOO much better. I think blade/anser style putters will be the minority soon, and possibly fall out completely, much like the 8802 and Bullseye of yesteryear.
  8. If a person can get past the visuals of a larger MOI putter, and distance control can be honed, I just cannot see how a blade putter could ever compare for stability and face control.
  9. I've been playing this all season now and it's still performing very well. If you're into medium compression surlyn, you doing yourself a disservice by not giving these a chance. Price and durability alone make this a no-brainer.
  10. This putter just flat out performs! Making a lot of lengthy putts beyond my usual. FWIW, I removed all the CB, cut it down to 34" and installed a GM Tour leather stitchback. 🤩
  11. Understanding impact conditions and trying to create them for an extended period after impact, is a good way of looking at it. Case in point, myself, as I've fallen victim to a fast closure rate through impact. Hooks and pulls are my enemy most days, when my swing mechanics fall apart. Rather than slow my closure or try to time it up better, I've gone to a method of keeping the face square after impact, by actually "flipping" at impact, which counters and wrist "rolling" post impact. It keeps my face on-line longer and it faces skyward rather than left and down in my follow-through. I don't carry a ton of shaft lean into impact, so my face control is much easier this way.
  12. Looks decent in slow mo. Post real speed, could be a huge tempo thing.
  13. As much as some folks won't admit it, this is very true. The world was FULL of Don Draper types.
  14. Yes, softer 2-piece surlyn will launch significantly higher.
×
×
  • Create New...